What brings you life?  A seemingly simple question, but when contemplated upon subtle nuances and more questions arise.  "Why did my relationship not emerge in my answering?"  "Am I really happy in my career?" A regular practice can help us discover what frees and what fetters our spirit.  Finding a regular practice can be challenging. If you are atheist or agnostic, you may not want a spiritual exercise but some other ritual that brings meaning and wisdom to your life.  The examen is a simple process that can function to enhance your depth and discernment.

The essense of the examen is two questions.  Both are equally important.

These questions can be asked many ways:  "When did I give and receive the most love today?"  "When did I give and receive the least love today?"  "What was today's high point?" " What was today's low point?" or "What gave me life today?"  "What drained me today?"   If you are working on a particular issues, you can explore that with the examen.  For example, "When today did I ask for what I needed?" "When today did I not ask for what I needed?" or "When did I listen to my inner voice today?"  "When did I ignore my inner voice today?"

The first question brings us gratitude.  It reminds us of what nourishes and fulfills us, what quenches our thirst. The second question acknowledges our difficulties and struggles.  It allows us to be with difficult emotions without avoiding or disavowing them. It prevents spiritual bypassing.  Acknowledging the sharp points, as Pema Chodron aptly calls them, is essential to wisdom. The key to the examen is answering without judgment.  No answer is right or wrong.  As Rilke says, no feeling is final.

Daily reflection is an important practice to help us grow and better know ourselves. Through this examination we learn what brings us life. You can make a ritual of the examen. Light a candle or make tea and sit quietly for a time before asking and reflecting upon your examen questions.  You may choose to journal your answers, or to draw as part of your practice. Make it your own. It does not have to be a long drawn out process; often the examen can be done in ten to twenty minutes. It is also a exercise you can do with others, as a way to build connection and vulnerability with loved ones.  Over time the examen can bring many gifts. Patterns emerge and we may see how we have changed over time and what nourishes us now. The examen is a simple and beautiful practice to add to your life. 

Since before Freud, therapists have stressed the important of early childhood experiences on the psyche and development.  With advances in neuroscience and ongoing research, we are learning more about the extent of the impact of early childhood experiences.  This is taken from Medical News Today.

From http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/287204.php

Do the effects of early caregiving experiences remain or fade as individuals develop? A new study has found that sensitive caregiving in the first three years of life predicts an individual's social competence and academic achievement, not only during childhood and adolescence, but also into adulthood.

The study, by researchers at the University of Minnesota, the University of Delaware, and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, appears in the journal Child Development. It was carried out in an effort to replicate and expand on findings from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, which showed that early maternal sensitivity has lasting associations with children's social and cognitive development at least through adolescence.

"The study indicates that the quality of children's early caregiving experiences has an enduring and ongoing role in promoting successful social and academic development into the years of maturity," notes Lee Raby, postdoctoral researcher at the University of Delaware, who led the study.

Sensitive caregiving is defined as the extent to which a parent responds to a child's signals appropriately and promptly, is positively involved during interactions with the child, and provides a secure base for the child's exploration of the environment.

The researchers used information from 243 individuals who were born into poverty, came from a range of racial/ethnic backgrounds, and had been followed from birth into adulthood (age 32) as part of the Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Risk and Adaptation. Observations of interactions between mothers and their children were collected four times during the children's first three years of life. At multiple ages during childhood and adolescence, teachers reported on children's functioning in their peer groups and children completed standardized tests of academic achievement. During their 20s and early 30s, participants completed interviews in which they discussed their experiences with romantic relationships and reported their educational attainment.

Individuals who experienced more sensitive caregiving early in life consistently functioned better socially and academically during the first three decades of life, the study found. The associations were larger for individuals' academic outcomes than for their functioning in peer and romantic relationships. Moreover, early caregiving experiences continued to predict individuals' academic, but not social, functioning after accounting for early socioeconomic factors as well as children's gender and ethnicity. Although families' economic resources were important predictors of children's development, these variables didn't fully account for the persistent and long-term influence of early caregiving experiences on individuals' academic success.

"Altogether, the study suggests that children's experiences with parents during the first few years of life have a unique role in promoting social and academic functioning--not merely during the first two decades of life, but also during adulthood," according to Raby. "This suggests that investments in early parent-child relationships may result in long-term returns that accumulate across individuals' lives. Because individuals' success in relationships and academics represents the foundation for a healthy society, programs and initiatives that equip parents to interact with their children in a sensitive manner during the first few years of their children's life can have long-term benefits for individuals, families, and society at large."

"Find your practice, and practice it."   - James Finley


When active in an addiction, the drug (or behavior) of choice becomes the addict's higher power.  Everything is second to fulfilling the needs of the craving.  When entering recovery the individual can feel lost and empty, as ironic as that may seem. There is a void and  emotions the addiction masked now are front and center.  Nothing works as quickly or as thoroughly as the drug and the newly sober do not know how to end the distress.  Developing a spiritual practice is one way to help lead a more fulfilling life.

However, developing and maintaining a spiritual practice can be difficult for anyone, with or without addiction.  Life is busy and stressful.  How much easier is it to lay on the sofa watching television than to do something which takes intention and patience?  Deciding what we want our practice to be is just as challenging:  yoga, meditation, prayer, lectio divina, martial arts, hiking, journaling, church, synagogue, the options are endless.  If you are agnostic or atheist, you can choose a practice as well- a gratitude practice, mindfulness practice, inspirational reading .  Interestingly, even atheists have been known to pray (here, here, and here).

The newly sober are looking for something to fill the hole the addiction masked; longing for something just as intense. I tell my clients that they have to get used to being bored without their addiction, but perhaps boredom is not quite right.  Those in recovery have to get used to the lack of intensity.  Your practice likely will not bring about some wonderful, blissful feeling on a regular basis, which makes consistent practice a challenge.  Channeling all the energy that was used to act out into an intentional life is the work.  That life may not feel exciting, but the faith needed is the faith that you will find serenity.  That you will discover your authentic self.

First find something that is meaningful and/or doable for you. Then commit to engaging with it. Maybe initially you try different forms of spiritual practice until you find one that resonates with you. (I do not recommend letting this "sampling" go on to long, or your practice will lack depth that comes from long term consistency).  Perhaps you settle on reading a daily meditation.  Commit to doing this on a regular basis, maybe not daily at first, so as not to shame yourself when it doesn't happen, but a minimum number of times per week.  If you choose to sit in meditation, start with 5 or 10 minutes and build from there. Don't start with a 30 minute sit, or it is likely you will abandon your practice out of frustration.

Your spiritual discipline may grow and transform over time.  For this to happen find a practice and practice it. You will not always want to, wanting to is irrelevant.  You may not always like it.  As my yoga teacher told me, you don't have to like your practice, you have to like the result.  (Then he said not be attached to the result, but that is another post.)  YOU have the choice to practice or not to practice.  No shame, no guilt if you choose not to do so.  It is simply a choice.  It is YOUR CHOICE.  Remember, self compassion is also a spiritual practice.  How you speak to yourself is important.  So when you choose to practice tell yourself, "I am choosing to practice."   When you don't, say to yourself,  "I am choosing not to practice" or "I am choosing to watch this show with my daughter instead."  This leads to more intentionality, more mindfulness in your daily life.   Finally, choose with the knowledge that the only way to reap the benefits of a spiritual discipline is to consistently choose to practice over time. Doing so is not easy, but consistently making intentional and healthful choices will lead to a sense of empowerment and agency in life. 


Knowing is not enough,
We must APPLY.
Willing is not enough, 
We must DO." 
                 - Bruce Lee



(Photo: David Reed)

 

Staying present to our emotions can be a challenge.  Yet, it is often the path towards healing, towards a deeper connection with ourselves.  We can feel like certain emotions are bad, or aren't spiritual, or are ones we shouldn't have.  Yet, each emotion can bring a gift.  What we resist, persists, as the saying goes.  What we deny in ourselves is our Shadow and is destined to find a way to express itself.  This poem by the Sufi mystic Rumi, invites us all to treat each emotion as an honorable guest.

THE GUEST HOUSE

This being human is a guest house.
Every morning a new arrival.

A joy, a depression, a meanness,
some momentary awareness comes
as an unexpected visitor.

Welcome and entertain them all!
Even if they are a crowd of sorrows,
who violently sweep your house
empty of its furniture,
still, treat each guest honorably.
He may be clearing you out
for some new delight.

The dark thought, the shame, the malice.
meet them at the door laughing and invite them in.

Be grateful for whatever comes.
because each has been sent
as a guide from beyond.



-- Jelaluddin Rumi,
    translation by Coleman Barks

Shame.  The feeling that "I am a mistake."  That "I am bad."  It leads to a deep sense of disconnect (triggering the PANIC circuit discussed in the post on affective neuroscience).  Shame can be at the root of addictions, perfectionism, and a host of other sorrows and suffering.   Brene Brown has studied shame, and her message is easily accessible.  That millions of people have watched this TEDtalk on shame speaks the pervasiveness in our culture. 

http://www.ted.com/talks/brene_brown_listening_to_shame

“I hate feeling this way.”  She said,  “…it is like I am wired to feel like this.”  

I have heard variations of this sentiment many, many times. (Each time I am reminded, Yes! Yes you are wired to feel like this.)  We as mammals ARE wired to feel like this, but that doesn’t mean it is never ending, that there is no hope.  I then explain the process that occurs deep in our brain and she expresses a sense of relief. “THAT makes sense!” she exclaims.   Understanding the underlying neurobiology to our processes helps us not just understand but regulate our nervous systems and those of our clients.  Dan Siegel’s Interpersonal Neurobiology uses this principal as the basis for conceptualization and treatment (Badenbock, 2008)

According to Jaak Panksepp, PhD, ALL mammals have seven primary affective (emotional) neurocircuits deep in the brain.  They are adaptive, essential to our survival, and part of our basic brain structure. (Panksepp, 2014)  While it is relatively well known now that the emotional center of the brain is in the limbic system, what Panksepp has found is that emotions are much more primitive, and hence much more powerful.  The emotional pathways extend far beyond the limbic system into the upper and middle brain stem. (Panksepp, personal communication, 2014)  These circuits reside in “ancient parts of the brain;” they are unconscious, hence the term primary. (Panksepp, 2014; Panksepp, 2012; Panksepp, 2010a)    “All aspects of mental life can be influenced by our primary-process feelings and the overall affective spectrum of the lower MindBrain is foundational for higher mental health issues” (Panksepp, 2012, p. xii). Emotions do not originate by a cognitive process. They begin in basic biological experiences deep in our brains and the subtleties (determining if we are feeling shame or guilt, anxiety or excitement) are then determined by our life experiences and our interpretations (secondary and tertiary processes, respectively, which I will explain below). The term MindBrain or BrainMind is Panksepp’s acknowledgment that we can not separate mind from brain and body. His theory is controversial in the field of affective neurobiology, but his decades of research supports his proposals.  This model will make sense to those who feel their emotions take over and to those therapists working with trauma and addiction.  It also helps to explain the power of sex addiction and other process addictions. 

First a few words of caution.  This is a very basic overview. The labels Panksepp chose for these seven circuits are not necessarily what we think of when we hear the word he uses for the circuit (RAGE for example).  He is not talking about the act of rage, but the neurological circuit in the brain that is the basis of the feeling (in this example anger and its associated behaviors).  Getting past the labels of the circuits may take some time, that is okay.  Because these systems are evolutionary and found in ALL mammals, he uses capital letters.  Also, this helps distinguish them from our experience of an emotion, our first thought when we hear the word rage.  The emotion in parentheses is the feeling equivalent that we experience so that there is a personal context for the neuronal structures in the brain. I will capitalize as well when referring to the primary process structures, rather than the feelings as we know them. Finally, the interpretation of how these systems play out in sex addiction are my conjectures and are not proven by his research. They are possibilities given my experience working with people and my understanding of his work.  So what are these seven primary-process feelings? 

FEAR (anxiety): There are two anxiety networks in the brain. One is FEAR; it is the flight system.  It is there when we feel threatened and helps us stay out of danger. It is the one activated when we worry.  

PANIC/GRIEF (sadness):  PANIC is the other anxiety network in the brain; it is imperative to attachment. PANIC is separation anxiety or grief over the loss of a loved one.  All mammals need an adult to survive when born, and the PANIC circuit is what helps infants attach to their parents.  “Animals who are often separated from their mothers for extended periods of time become maladjusted” (Weintraub, 2012)  Opioids are a significant part of the attachment and PANIC system in mammals, along with oxytocin and prolactin.  Anyone addicted to opioids understands the power of the bond with this drug.

RAGE (anger):  RAGE is the fight circuit.  When backed into a corner an animal attacks, RAGE tells us we have to fight to survive.  RAGE indicates that a boundary has been violated.  Although uncomfortable, without anger there would be no civil rights movement, no defending of ourselves when attacked or when our loved ones are threatened. There are two types of anger, the first is agitated rage, which is uncomfortable and is the rage/anger most of us think of when we think of anger.  This agitated rage is based in the RAGE circuit. The second is related to the SEEKING circuit.

SEEKING (expectancy):  SEEKING is our curiosity, our need for newness.  What is called the reward system is a part of this expansive, perhaps primary system. It is the largest affective circuit in the brain. In fact the term reward system is misleading, “as the brain has many reward systems” (Panksepp, 2014, Personal communication). This is what helps our brains develop new neurons (yes our brains do develop new neurons and new neuronal connections). According to Panksepp SEEKING is the basis of addiction (we all know the term drug seeking). What psychology calls the reward system is a small part of the SEEKING network. The reward system is, in part, Medial Forebrain Bundle, but it is so much more than just reward (Panksepp, 2014). It is curiosity and enthusiasm.  It impacts anger. Interestingly, there are different types of anger, one is related to the SEEKING system which is predatory rage and is considered pleasurable.  Rage associated with SEEKING may also be primary to sexualized rage, part of the rage associated with sexual addiction and sexual perpetrators (sex addicts are not necessarily sexual perpetrators). Animals with predatory rage try to increase it, while those with agitated rage try to decrease the experience. It seems that both RAGE and SEEKING circuits would be involved in sexualized rage and may be dependent upon the individual’s life experiences and genetics.

Panksepp argues that the description of “reward systems” in the brain disregards much of the processes and role of affect in our behavior. In fact deep brain stimulation of the Medial Forebrain Bundle (the reward system) create “states of positive enthusiasm, that normally accompany the appetitive-foraging phase of behavior in our species, as we have long predicted” (Panksepp, 2014, p. 210). This suggests that much more is happening than a simple behavioral view of reward and punishment.  It adds a level of understanding to why the rewards are so powerful. If it were as simple as the behaviorists suggest, quitting an addiction would be easy via extinction and other behavioral interventions. Unfortunately addiction are not so easy to stop.  It is not simply pleasure but an enjoyable feeling state that is directly related to our survival instincts. 

However, he recognizes secondary and tertiary emotional processes that work in a circuit (see chart).  Secondary processes are learning processes that arise from various forms of conditioning (rewards and punishments); while the tertiary process is our thinking and ruminating and what is commonly associated with emotional life and that is impacted by interventions such as Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy. Tertiary processes are the worrying over and over what will happen if, the catastrophizing in anxiety, and the thoughts about how one will get a fix in addiction (Panksepp, 2010a).

In Archeology of Mind (2012), Panksepp writes, “Most modern psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral approaches to therapy fail to see SEEKING as a basic emotional urge. Some researchers also tend to confuse FEAR and PANIC/GRIEF, seeing anxiety as a single manifestation” (p.xv). I would add that therapist and doctors too see anxiety as a singular expression, when often the nuances are quite distinct.  It is important to determine the difference as interventions may be more or less effective depending on the system involved. For example, when PANIC is involved I often need other strategies than cognitive interventions. Since SEEKING is such an important factor in addiction, more will be written about this and other systems in later posts.

CARE (nurturance):  CARE is as it sounds, it is our affection for those close to us and for the world around us. It is our need to feel cared for and to care for others. It too is primary to our bonding with those we love.

LUST (sexual excitement):  LUST is also part of our love for others and our need for sexual intimacy.  In terms of survival we must have sex to propagate the species. Clearly in sexual compulsivity LUST is a primary process, however, it may not be the first activated for many individual but become active after the FEAR or PANIC or another system is involved.

PLAY (social joy):  PLAY is integral to our emotional life, all animals play. It is the basis of joy in the brain.  PLAY is imperative to brain development and attachment. Research has shown that playing enhances frontal lobe development.  Play therapists know that getting on the floor and playing with one’s child improves attachment, this is why.  As adults we must continue to have social engagement and playfulness.  This is often a difficult task for recovering addicts, in part because play seems confused by SEEKING (excitement) and fun becomes the use of the drug or behavior. In other words the excitement of fix feels like fun, although it is another brain circuit altogether. This is where our secondary and tertiary processes come into the mix. PLAY stems from brain areas that are more basic - not higher order thinking.  This is in part why Panksepp believes the removal of play from schools has led to a spike in ADHD. Finally, play reduces aggression, suggesting the link between these systems.

As you can see these networks interrelate.  There is a saying in neuroscience, what fires together, wires together.  This means that neurons that fire at the same time become paired together.  This is a completely unconscious process.  You can see how this plays out in various forms of addiction.  SEEKING if activated with LUST leads to sexual searching.  If our PANIC circuit is triggered and was alleviated by the enjoyment of LUST (sex), and this happens frequently the two networks in the brain will then fire off simultaneously when even one is activated.  Additionally, if CARE and LUST become paired, for example through sexual abuse or other secondary and tertiary processes, then sex and intimacy become confused in a basic, unconscious way.  I asked Dr. Panksepp if this is possible and he explained yes it was, in this manner: 

"The SEEKING System is truly enormous, and beside integrating appetitive eagerness (enthusiasm), it also can be devoted to LUST issues where gonadal hormone receptors are concentrated (POA), as well as CARE where oxytocin and prolactin receptors are concentrated.   Thus, all the positive emotional system, including PLAY converge on the SEEKING urge, but are distinct enough to be seen as distinguishable appetitive urges" (personal communication, 2014).

When secondary process of rewards and punishments come into play and then our interpretation of events and what this means about who we are, patterns of coping become quite complex.  Given this complexity, changing behavior becomes very difficult.  Anyone who is in recovery from sexual compulsion can attest to the difficulty of staying on the path.  

This is not to say that all is lost and that adults are not responsible for their behavior. They most certainly are, but what this suggests is that we have to be aware of and work with the primary circuits for change to occur.  Those working with addictions know this and do this inherently.  Programs try to develop healthy fun activities to reengage the PLAY circuit with  new behaviors. They are trying to disconnect PLAY from SEEKING, specifically drug seeking, and build the important social connection all of us need. SEEKING then changes too. In essence part of the work is pairing PLAY with CARE.  However, addictions can be cunning, powerful, and baffling- a trigger can arise at any time.  The primacy of these circuits gives us an understanding of why.

Finally, what most people call positive feelings, “indicate that animals are returning to “comfort zones” that support survival, while negative affects reflect “discomfort zones” that indicate that animals are in situations that may impair survival” (Panksepp, 2010a; Panksepp 2010b). Despite Panksepp’s word choice, this model suggests, and as Linehan and many others explicitly point out, that emotions are not good or bad, negative or positive, but they are either what Katie O’Shea describes as life protecting (FEAR, RAGE, PANIC) or life enhancing, helping us regulate our nervous systems by calming us and returning us to homeostasis (SEEKING, CARE, etc)  (2014, training).  Thinking about your feelings in this way can helps you accept your emotional experiences, become mindful of the process, and therefore less reactive to a feeling.  Judging your feelings as bad only leads to resistance and a desire for the unpleasantness to go away and fear that the pleasant emotions won’t last.  When faced with a difficult feeling, remind yourself that this is how your brain is designed to respond in order to protect you.  Asking, “What is this emotion trying to protect me from?” can help shift your perspective.

REFERENCES

Bradenbock, Being a Brain-Wise Therapist.

O’Shea, K. (2014). When There are No Words. Training. 

Panksepp, J. (2014.) Integrating Bottom-up Internalist Views of Emotional Feelings with Top-down Externalist Views: Might Brain Affective Changes Constitute Reward and Punishment Effect within Animal Brains? Cortex; 59: 208-213.

Panksepp, J. October 27, 2014. Email communication

Panksepp, J. (2012). Archeology of Mind. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Panksepp, J. (2010a) Affective neuroscience of the emotional BrainMind: Evolutionalry perspectives and implications for understanding depression. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience; 12(4): 533-545.

Panksepp, J. Archeology of Mind P.xii

Panksepp, J. (2010b). Dialogues Clinical Neuroscience. 12(4):533-545. Affective Neuroscience of the Emotional BrainMind: Evolutionary Perspectives and Implications for Understainding Depression.


Weintraub, P. (2012, May 31) Discover Interview: Jaak Panksepp Pinned Down Humanity’s 7 Primal Emotions.  Discover Magazine. http://discovermagazine.com/2012/may/11-jaak-panksepp-rat-tickler-found-humans-7-primal-emotions.